No Result
View All Result
China Secrets Revealed
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • News
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • News
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
China Secrets Revealed
No Result
View All Result
Home Stock

Punishing Universities for Their Viewpoints Violates the First Amendment

by
June 24, 2025
in Stock
0
Punishing Universities for Their Viewpoints Violates the First Amendment

Thomas A. Berry

The Trump administration has taken actions to withhold billions of dollars in contracts from Harvard University unless the institution both adopts governance structures approved by the administration and engages in affirmative efforts to promote underrepresented conservative viewpoints on campus. Harvard has now sued the Trump administration, arguing that these conditions violate the First Amendment (among other claims). Cato has joined a broad coalition of organizations, led by the ACLU, to file an amicus brief supporting Harvard.

Our brief explains why the actions taken by the administration violate core principles of free speech and academic freedom. While government funding is not a right, freedom from ideological coercion is a constitutional guarantee. Using the government’s purse strings to compel the government’s preferred speech environment violates both academic freedom and the First Amendment. Allowing coercion here would invite a wider regime of retaliation, coercion, and ideological bullying throughout American life.

At the heart of the First Amendment lies a simple rule: the government may not impose its preferred viewpoint on private parties. Viewpoint discrimination is presumptively unconstitutional, even when officials claim they merely want to “better balance” ideological representation. Indeed, even coerced preferences for truly underrepresented perspectives still amount to unconstitutional viewpoint-based restrictions, because the state has no authority to dictate the proper mix of opinions within a private institution.

Further, government pressure to alter privately expressed viewpoints is presumptively unconstitutional even when that pressure is exerted through a loss of government funding. Governments may cut benefits programs for many legitimate reasons. But once the government establishes a benefits program, it cannot condition participation on a recipient’s exercise—or non-exercise—of rights that fall outside the program’s scope.

Here, officials have openly cited speech by Harvard students and faculty, wholly unrelated to any federally funded project, as the reason to terminate grants. That is textbook unconstitutional discrimination.

This violation is especially troubling given the university’s role in a free society. Higher education is both a crucible of knowledge and a structural check on unchecked governmental power. The Supreme Court has long held that conditions attached to public funds face heightened scrutiny when they burden the “four essential freedoms” of academia: deciding who may teach, what shall be taught, how it shall be taught, and who may study. Subordinating these freedoms to the political aims of the party in power would replace free inquiry with political doctrine.

Finally, our brief makes clear that nothing in our argument minimizes or exempts Harvard from its viewpoint-neutral obligations to comply with federal civil rights law. To the extent that the Trump administration seeks to remedy alleged violations of laws like the Civil Rights Act, it can—indeed must—do so. But the Civil Rights Act must be enforced through its procedures and in a manner consistent with the First Amendment. 

The administration’s wholesale cancelation of funding to exert ideological control over private education merely wields allegations of lawbreaking as a tool for unlawful ends, and the courts should hold that it violates the First Amendment.

Previous Post

Republican senator calls caucusing with Democrats an ‘interesting hypothetical’

Next Post

Trump dares AOC to try to impeach him: ‘Make my day’

Next Post
Trump dares AOC to try to impeach him: ‘Make my day’

Trump dares AOC to try to impeach him: ‘Make my day’

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get the daily email that makes reading the news actually enjoyable. Stay informed and entertained, for free.
Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Republicans scrap deal in ‘big, beautiful bill’ to lower restrictions on states’ AI regulations

Republicans scrap deal in ‘big, beautiful bill’ to lower restrictions on states’ AI regulations

0
TD Cowen downgrades Molson Coors, lowers price target to $58: Is it time to exit?

TD Cowen downgrades Molson Coors, lowers price target to $58: Is it time to exit?

0
Google’s antitrust ruling draws parallels to Microsoft’s 25-year-old case: Here’s how

Google’s antitrust ruling draws parallels to Microsoft’s 25-year-old case: Here’s how

0
In 2023, Colorado Lawmakers Pushed Back on Cops Practicing Pain Medicine Based on Flawed CDC Guideline

In 2023, Colorado Lawmakers Pushed Back on Cops Practicing Pain Medicine Based on Flawed CDC Guideline

0
Republicans scrap deal in ‘big, beautiful bill’ to lower restrictions on states’ AI regulations

Republicans scrap deal in ‘big, beautiful bill’ to lower restrictions on states’ AI regulations

July 1, 2025
Trump’s achievements embolden him to be even more aggressive

Trump’s achievements embolden him to be even more aggressive

July 1, 2025
Trump warns of ‘whopping 68% tax increase’ if Senate fails to pass historic bill

Trump warns of ‘whopping 68% tax increase’ if Senate fails to pass historic bill

July 1, 2025
Home Depot is buying GMS for about $4.3 billion as it chases more home pros

Home Depot is buying GMS for about $4.3 billion as it chases more home pros

July 1, 2025

Recent News

Republicans scrap deal in ‘big, beautiful bill’ to lower restrictions on states’ AI regulations

Republicans scrap deal in ‘big, beautiful bill’ to lower restrictions on states’ AI regulations

July 1, 2025
Trump’s achievements embolden him to be even more aggressive

Trump’s achievements embolden him to be even more aggressive

July 1, 2025
Trump warns of ‘whopping 68% tax increase’ if Senate fails to pass historic bill

Trump warns of ‘whopping 68% tax increase’ if Senate fails to pass historic bill

July 1, 2025
Home Depot is buying GMS for about $4.3 billion as it chases more home pros

Home Depot is buying GMS for about $4.3 billion as it chases more home pros

July 1, 2025

Disclaimer: ChinaSecretsRevealed.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2024 ChinaSecretsRevealed. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • News
  • Stock

Copyright © 2024 ChinaSecretsRevealed. All Rights Reserved.